This module is BETA code, which means that the interfaces are fairly stable BUT it has not been out in the community long enough to guarantea $self->interface(ENTITY_CLASS => 'MIME::MyEntity'); $self->interface(HEAD_CLASS => 'MIME::MyHead'); $self; ### return }
With no VALUE, returns the VALUE currently associated with that ROLE.
If you set the output_to_core option to false before parsing
(the default), then we call output_path() and create a
new MIME::Body::File on that filename.
If you set the output_to_core option to true before parsing,
then you get a MIME::Body::InCore instead.
If you want the parser to do something else entirely, you can override this method in a subclass.
If you do override this, make certain that the object you return is
set for binmode(), and is able to handle the following methods:
read(BUF, NBYTES)
getline()
getlines()
print(@ARGS)
flush()
seek(0, 0)
Fatal exception if the stream could not be established.
If RECYCLE is given, it is an object returned by a previous invocation of this method; to recycle it, this method must effectively rewind and truncate it, and return the same object. If you don't want to support recycling, just ignore it and always return a new object.
### Parse an input stream:
eval { $entity = $parser->parse(\*STDIN) };
if (!$entity) { ### parse failed!
my $decapitated = $parser->last_head;
...
}
Optimum input mechanisms:
parse() YES (if you give it a globref or a
subclass of IO::File)
parse_open() YES
parse_data() NO (see below)
parse_two() NO (see below)
Optimum settings:
decode_headers() *** (no real difference; 0 is slightly faster)
extract_nested_messages() 0 (may be slightly faster, but in
general you want it set to 1)
output_to_core() 0 (will be MUCH faster)
tmp_recycling() 1? (probably, but should be investigated)
tmp_to_core() 0 (will be MUCH faster)
use_inner_files() 0 (if tmp_to_core() is 0;
use 1 otherwise)
File I/O is much faster than in-core I/O. Although it seems like slurping a message into core and processing it in-core should be faster... it isn't. Reason: Perl's filehandle-based I/O translates directly into native operating-system calls, whereas the in-core I/O is implemented in Perl.
Inner files are slower than real tmpfiles, but faster than in-core ones. If speed is your concern, that's why you should set use_inner_files(true) if you set tmp_to_core(true): so that we can bypass the slow in-core tmpfiles if the input stream permits.
Native I/O is much faster than object-oriented I/O. It's much faster to use <$foo> than $foo->getline. For backwards compatibilty, this module must continue to use object-oriented I/O in most places, but if you use parse() with a "real" filehandle (string, globref, or subclass of IO::File) then MIME::Parser is able to perform some crucial optimizations.
The parse_two() call is very inefficient.
Currently this is just a front-end onto parse_data().
If your OS supports it, you're far better off doing something like:
$parser->parse_open("/bin/cat msg.head msg.body |");
Optimum input mechanisms:
parse() YES
parse_open() YES
parse_data() NO (in-core I/O will burn core)
parse_two() NO (in-core I/O will burn core)
Optimum settings:
decode_headers() *** (no real difference)
extract_nested_messages() *** (no real difference)
output_to_core() 0 (will use MUCH less memory)
tmp_recycling() 0? (promotes faster GC if
tmp_to_core is 1)
tmp_to_core() 0 (will use MUCH less memory)
use_inner_files() *** (no real difference, but set it to 1
if you *must* have tmp_to_core set to 1,
so that you avoid in-core tmpfiles)
Optimum input mechanisms:
parse() *** (doesn't matter)
parse_open() *** (doesn't matter)
parse_data() *** (doesn't matter)
parse_two() *** (doesn't matter)
Optimum settings:
decode_headers() 0 (sidesteps problem of bad hdr encodings)
extract_nested_messages() 0 (sidesteps problems of bad nested messages,
but often you want it set to 1 anyway).
output_to_core() *** (doesn't matter)
tmp_recycling() *** (doesn't matter)
tmp_to_core() *** (doesn't matter)
use_inner_files() *** (doesn't matter)
Optimum input mechanisms:
parse() YES (if you give it a seekable handle)
parse_open() YES (becomes a seekable handle)
parse_data() NO (unless you set tmp_to_core(1))
parse_two() NO (unless you set tmp_to_core(1))
Optimum settings:
decode_headers() *** (doesn't matter)
extract_nested_messages() *** (doesn't matter)
output_to_core() *** (doesn't matter)
tmp_recycling 1 (restricts created files to 1 per parser)
tmp_to_core() 1
use_inner_files() 1
If we can use them, inner files avoid most tmpfiles. If you parse from a seekable-and-tellable filehandle, then the internal process_to_bound() doesn't need to extract each part into a temporary buffer; it can use IO::InnerFile (warning: this will slow down the parsing of messages with large attachments).
You can veto tmpfiles entirely. If you might not be parsing from a seekable-and-tellable filehandle, you can set tmp_to_core() true: this will always use in-core I/O for the buffering (warning: this will slow down the parsing of messages with large attachments).
Final resort. You can always override new_tmpfile() in a subclass.
A better solution for this case would be to set up some form of state machine for input processing. This will be left for future versions.
The revised implementation uses a temporary file (a la tmpfile())
during parsing to hold the encoded portion of the current MIME
document or part. This file is deleted automatically after the
current part is decoded and the data is written to the "body stream"
object; you'll never see it, and should never need to worry about it.
Some folks have asked for the ability to bypass this temp-file mechanism, I suppose because they assume it would slow down their application. I considered accomodating this wish, but the temp-file approach solves a lot of thorny problems in parsing, and it also protects against hidden bugs in user applications (what if you've directed the encoded part into a scalar, and someone unexpectedly sends you a 6 MB tar file?). Finally, I'm just not conviced that the temp-file use adds significant overhead.
"\r\n"). However, it is extremely likely that folks will want to
parse MIME streams where each line ends in the local newline
character "\n" instead.
An attempt has been made to allow the parser to handle both CRLF and newline-terminated input.
"7bit" and "8bit" decoders will decode both
a "\n" and a "\r\n" end-of-line sequence into a "\n".
The "binary" decoder (default if no encoding specified)
still outputs stuff verbatim... so a MIME message with CRLFs
and no explicit encoding will be output as a text file
that, on many systems, will have an annoying ^M at the end of
each line... but this is as it should be.
If your mailer creates multipart boundary strings that contain newlines when they appear in the message body, give it two weeks notice and find another one. If your mail robot receives MIME mail like this, regard it as syntactically incorrect MIME, which it is.
Why do I say that? Well, in RFC-1521, the syntax of a boundary is
given quite clearly:
boundary := 0*69<bchars> bcharsnospace
bchars := bcharsnospace / " "
bcharsnospace := DIGIT / ALPHA / "'" / "(" / ")" / "+" /"_"
/ "," / "-" / "." / "/" / ":" / "=" / "?"
All of which means that a valid boundary string cannot have newlines in it, and any newlines in such a string in the message header are expected to be solely the result of folding the string (i.e., inserting to-be-removed newlines for readability and line-shortening only).
Yet, there is at least one brain-damaged user agent out there
that composes mail like this:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----ABC-
123----"
Subject: Hi... I'm a dork!
This is a multipart MIME message (yeah, right...)
----ABC-
123----
Hi there!
We have got to discourage practices like this (and the recent file upload idiocy where binary files that are part of a multipart MIME message aren't base64-encoded) if we want MIME to stay relatively simple, and MIME parsers to be relatively robust.
Thanks to Andreas Koenig for bringing a baaaaaaaaad user agent to my attention.
Eryq (
All rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
$Revision: 5.406 $ $Date: 2000/11/12 05:55:11 $